Optimization complete

Vehicle Routing
Executive Dashboard

A clear view of the optimized last-mile dispatch plan, benchmark improvement, fleet utilization, route balance, cost, and estimated CO₂ impact.

CVRPTW · OR-Tools
Customers served
55
100% of generated orders
Vehicles used
8
of 9 available
Distance reduction
10.1%
27.9 miles avoided
Dispatch cost
$1,068
$35 simulated savings
CO₂ avoided
25.0 kg
vs. benchmark
Avg. utilization
90.3%
across active vehicles

Mileage comparison

Nearest-neighbor benchmark vs. optimized routes
−27.9 mi
274.4
Benchmark
246.5
Optimized

Capacity utilization

Average load across dispatched vehicles
90.3%utilized
Operational readout: Eight vehicles are sufficient. A seven-vehicle fleet is infeasible under the current capacity and time-window constraints.

Optimized miles by vehicle

Route-distance balance across the active fleet
36.3
V2
31.3
V3
37.6
V4
26.6
V5
27.9
V6
25.5
V7
31.8
V8
29.7
V9

Fleet-size sensitivity

Feasibility and simulated dispatch cost
7Infeasible
8$1,068.18
9$1,068.18
10$1,068.14
11$1,068.18
Planning decision: Additional available vehicles do not materially change cost because the optimizer still dispatches eight routes. Maintain eight operational vehicles with one spare for resilience.

Route operations summary

Active routes produced by the optimized solution
VehicleCustomersLoadUtilizationMilesRoute timeEst. cost
V2885100.0%36.25359 min$140.32
V377385.9%31.31426 min$134.14
V478094.1%37.59361 min$141.99
V567891.8%26.58222 min$128.22
V664957.7%27.86393 min$129.83
V768296.5%25.51316 min$126.89
V8785100.0%31.76384 min$134.70
V988296.5%29.69432 min$132.11